BLANK

BLANK: his entire emotional range in one word.
(Keanu Reeves)
picture: dunno source, via our lol builder. lol caption: patrick
« Previous RON BURGUNDY | BITCHES GOT NO TASTE Next »

BLANK: his entire emotional range in one word.
(Keanu Reeves)
picture: dunno source, via our lol builder. lol caption: patrick
First FIRST FFIIIRRRSSSTTTTT
BWAH HAH Hah hah ha
EXACTLY what I thought when I saw the movie. Terrible remake, imo.
I remember when sci fi was about stuff blowing up and universal messages of goodness. Not shamefully plugging the environmental left.
The original “Day the Earth Stood Still,” made in 1951, was about ending all war, nuclear war in particular. One could see that as a “universal message of goodness” or as “shamefully plugging the anti-nukes left,” which was beginning to gain followers and reached its height in the 60s.
Of course, Star Wars fits into the category of being about universal goodness and nice explosions. But as a huge fan of sci-fi books and movies, I don’t think there has ever been a time in which science fiction focused exclusively on universal messages and ignored the issues of the day. In short, I think your “remember when” never was. In reality, remember “Brave New World” and “1984,” to name the most popular? As well as “The Forever War” and a host of others.
Even if you ignore books and focus on movies and TV shows, the new “Battlestar Galactica” is more about a universal message of complexity and confusion than pure goodness, and often “plugged” issues of the day, such as torture and the effects of prolonged war on society.
Of course, you may be thinking more of the “space opera” genre of sci-fi, but even space the original Star Trek occasionally had episodes that focused on a specific issue, such as racism, rather than “universal goodness.” I certainly wouldn’t say that a sci-fi movie about environmentalism goes outside any usual or former norms for the science fiction genre as a whole.
If your point is that you disagree with the theme or message of the “Day the Earth Stood Still” remake, I can certainly respect that. But science fiction works that take a stance on social issues are certainly nothing new, and neither is it new for people to disagree with them!
I would not want to meet that guy in a dark alley *shivers*
I would!
Oh I would. Hopefully without pants.
My thoughts exactly.
To quote, “WHOA.”
And he’s STILL hotter than you.
WOW
and he will play spike spiegel *cry*
That is a travesty. The man has never shown the slightest speck of humor in any of his work that I’ve seen which means a large dimension of Spike’s character (the wry humor) will not be present. I’m not usually a guy who will scream “this will suck” buuuttt………..
I’m guessing you have seen none of his earlier works then.
I don’t know whether to orgasm that it’s Keanu, to cry that it’s -Keanu-, or to cry that it’s live action.
He was pretty funny in Thumbsucker.
We all know he wasn’t acting in Bill and Ted’s Excellent Adventures….that’s just how he is. To quote Hermione Granger, he has the emotional range of a teaspoon.
There is no spoon.
only Zuul?
Ghostbusters win.
and I should have seen that coming.
Um, OK… I, personally, would have gone with “Wooden”, but it’s all good.
Although the remake needed perhaps a -teeny- bit more action, I think he did alright. Kinda reminded me of an alien James Bond.
Completely off-topic, but Greg Grunberg (that could be spelled wrong, but I don’t really care) from Heroes looks like a fat Keanu Reeves. True story.
mmmmm yummy
He may be wooden, and have the emotional range of a teaspoon, but people still want to see him in movies… *drools*
You know the question from the movie, “You’re not from this planet, are you?”
Well…
GIVE HIM A BREAK YOU SICK PEOPLE, HIS WIFE IS DEAD.
No one that has ever lost someone or will ever die should get made fun of, right? Think that next time you make fun of someone
Get lost, troll! He was never married.
Do you even know who this is?
is that why he has sucked from the beginning of his career?
I’d say that word is more like, “Dude.”
in my opinion,
in bad taste.
i love this man, my favourite actor.
in all my favourite films.
and he is beautiful!
Why did they have to pick this man to play Spike Spiegel?
Because he’s the one driving the project?
It’s a bummer but at least they’re going to make the movie and at least it’s a reasonably cool guy playing the part. It could be a lot worse – but yeah, it could have been SO much better.
AMEN
I never understood why people in Hollywood still hire him.
Cos he is HOT!
Haterz…
Oh well, there’s no accounting for taste.
It’s so true.
teh person who madethis caption has never seen “bill and ted excellent adventure!!!!!”
this is strangely sexy D: