You know what’s hot?
You know what’s hot? Proper usage of apostrophes.
(Paris Hilton)
Picture by: Random. Caption by: MelodysSong via Advanced Lol Builder
You May Like:
-
'Razzi Sez:
mushycatz3 on Little Bo Peep has lost her… Quarxyz on Drama queen! 142978 on And women wore panties .. The Roc on And women wore panties .. Alice on Drama queen! King_Mario on Drama queen! McFirst on Drama queen! Alison on And women wore panties .. Alison on And women wore panties .. Hayden A. Smith on I’m Gonna Let You Finish… 
Cheezburger Network Blog-
FIRST !!!
You have died of dysentery.
Oregon Trail FTW
The Diocletianic Persecution was the last and most severe persecution of Christians in the Roman empire. In 303, Emperor Diocletian and his colleagues Maximian, Galerius, and Constantius issued a series of edicts rescinding Christians’ legal rights and demanding they comply with traditional religious practices. Later edicts targeted the clergy and demanded universal sacrifice, ordering all inhabitants to sacrifice to the gods. The persecution varied in intensity across the empire—weakest in Gaul and Britain, where only the first edict was applied, and strongest in the Eastern provinces. Constantius’ son, Constantine, on taking the imperial office in 306, restored Christians to full legal equality and returned property confiscated during the persecution. The persecution failed to check the rise of the church. By 324, Constantine was sole ruler of the empire, and Christianity had become his favored religion. Although the persecution resulted in the deaths of—according to one modern estimate—3,000 Christians, and the torture, imprisonment, or dislocation of many more, most Christians avoided punishment. The persecution did, however, cause many churches to split between those who had complied with imperial authority (the traditores), and those who had remained “pure”. Modern historians have tended to downplay the scale and depth of the Diocletianic persecution.
Alos maybe a slightly more natural skin tone.
I make a point of always using my apostophores completely all correct-like. Except for when I don’t. Er, d’ont…do’n…’do…oh, never mind.
Someone sounds jealous.
Honestly, what is there to be jealous OF?
She can’t sing.
She can’t act.
She can’t model (she even has a freakin’ lazy eye!)
She’s only famous because her dad is rich and her sex tape leaked (she isn’t even good in porn), and more people around the country make fun of her than the amount of people that actually like her.
OMG, I TOTALLY WANT THAT!!! MOMMY, DYE MY HAIR BLONDE AND TAKE ME TO THE TANNING BED, I WANT TO BE LIKE PARIS HILTON!!!
Win.
I don’t find her attractive, but I will concede that many people do (she’s too thin and potentially inbred for my liking). I will say, however, that she was remarkably decent in “Repo!” (albeit hers was a small role).
“Hot” isn’t exactly what crosses my mind when I look at this picture… but I still like it because of the caption. All belly aching about the difficulty of the English language aside, how hard is it to remember that “can’t” is just a contraction of “can not” and the helpful little apostrophe is there for a reason?
How hard is it to remember these things indeed! As a grammar teacher this is one of my favorite captions ever.
The worst is when someone puts an apostrophe before an S when the S indicates that the word is plural. I can’t stand that.
I still can’t keep track of when to use “who” and “whom,” though.
A teacher once told me to use “who” when the question could be answered with “he” and to use “whom” when the question could be answered with “him.” It’s easy to remember because the first two both end in vowels and the second two both end in “m.”
That’s why Paris’s shirt doesn’t have one – the misuse of apostrophes in plural words has caused a shortage.
The whole plural ’s thing really gets on my tit’s too.
It should be pointed out, however, that some languages do use the ’s in order to indicate plural items. For example, in Dutch, many newer words ending in a vowel will quite commonly be pluralised with an ’s.
Not that that’s any excuse for some f*ckw!ts’ inability to use their first and only language adequately.
Some people also forget that “cannot” is one word.
Either is grammatically correct, actually.
Not, of course, that this makes “can not” wrong, or changes the fact that the abbreviation is always “can‘t”.
You know what’s hot? Paris getting mowed down by a speeding Limo.
You know what’s hotter? Paris getting mowed down by an English teacher in a used ‘97 camry, or a farmer on a John Deere.
I would LOVE to see that.
If you get turned on by apostrophes, 3rd through 6th grades must have been really difficult for you….
1. Knocking Paris Hilton has been done to death.
2. It looks like she’s using her apostrophes right to me.
Is that Paris?
Meh, I always forget what she looks like.
(2) First recorded (and FAIL) attempt to use the word “apostrophe” as a double entendre!
Take a grammar lesson, whore.
Bloody brilliant! I love this one!
She always hot and mad.
ARghhhhh … kill it, KILL IT WITH FIRE!!!
Even fire doesn’t want to be all over that.
Only place in the world where you can’t start a bush fire….
Paris Hilton looks damn hot! in this white T-shirt and blue skirt.. And the slogan is well suited for her..
I’ma hunt me down some trolls for supper! Starting with you!
Her shirt’s from the Hollywood Undead song “No.5″ X3
Are we sure that is not a P.H. look alike, I’m suspicious.
Also, @ Mike, Whom is always the object of a preposition. If you use a preposition, then you use whom. . . eg: to whom, of whom, for whom, above, below, around, about, near, under, over – whom! Get it?
M
seriously, when the hell is the internet gonna stop posting pics of this skank?
The worst part about this is the fact that on the back of that shirt it genuinely says: “YOUR NOT”
What is hot is know the difference between an apostrophe and an exclamation point.
I don’t like the girl all that much, not a fan of media whores, but I’d be more than glad to draw that apostrophe in for her with a Sharpie. Or my tongue. Wait, did I type that out loud?